School of Engineering at the University of Edinburgh
Institute for Infrastructure and Environment
University crest - link to University home page
Institute Home
Information
People
Research Groups
News
Institute Seminars

Industrial Advisory Board

Postgraduate-
Opportunities

Finding Us
Contact and Directory
Search
Health & Safety
University Search

Home Pages
The School
The College
The University

"Goldfish will save us from flood, say scientists"

Thus the headline in the Sunday Herald, 29 February 2004. Dr Miklas Scholz, part of the Institute's Environmental Engineering Research Group, has been studying and investigating the potential of wetlands as Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems for some time. He now believes that Goldfish can be used to solve a problem which has hampered the development of these systems. The full article, from the Sunday Herald, is given below:


Dr Scholz and Megan

By Rob Edwards, Environment Editor, Sunday Herald

It might look like a humble goldfish … but it’s a key component of “sustainable urban drainage systems of the future”, otherwise known as ponds. An expert in drainage systems believes goldfish can help cities solve their water problems.

Dr Miklas Scholz, a researcher and lecturer at Edinburgh University’s School of Engineering and Electronics, is a pioneer in the use of drainage ponds, which have been promoted by the government’s green watchdog, the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (Sepa), and supported by Scottish Water.

There are more than 800 already existing in Scotland, ranging from filtered trenches, soakaways and small ponds to large ponds and wetlands.

They are seen as a good way of conserving and using rainwater that would otherwise go to waste, and could also relieve the pressure on sewers after storms. They are like a modern version of the water butts traditionally kept beneath drainpipes used to water the garden.

The trouble is, they’re not attractive. Matters are made worse when they get clogged with pondweed and covered in algae. Which is where the goldfish come in, says Scholz. He has a plan to fill the ponds with goldfish, which would eat the weed and algae.

“I don’t mind being associated with what may seem a mad idea. It’s an original idea, and it could work,” he told the Sunday Herald. “The goldfish will be an add-on to increase public acceptance and to reduce the amount of algae.” They will, as it were, gild the lily-pond.

If Scholz’s vision becomes a reality, rainwater that now runs into sewers will instead flow into ponds stocked with the carp’s more colourful cousin. “Goldfish-filled sustainable urban drainage systems are the future,” he declared. “I’ve no doubt about it.”

Scholz believes a five-square-metre drainage pond, stocked with six or seven two-inch goldfish, could serve a small group of houses. “There will be plenty of sustainable urban drainage systems [Suds] everywhere, and plenty of little goldies there,” he said.

According to Scholz, the scheme could be demonstrated at one of the new sustainable drainage systems planned for Dunfermline, Livingston and Glasgow. He has begun an experiment at the University of Edinburgh’s King’s Buildings campus aimed at proving that the goldfish pond will work.

He is keeping 43 goldfish in eight tanks and measuring the amounts of different types of algae that they eat. So far, the results suggest that a goldfish’s favourite nibble is filamentous algae, better known as pond scum or blanketweed. They are less fond of Canadian pond weed and common starwort.

Scholz is also running an experimental sustainable drainage system on the King’s Buildings site, including two ponds. He hopes to stock the ponds with goldfish later this year.

He is confident his idea will be popular, and claims anglers have already illegally introduced fish into drainage ponds in Dunfermline. But he accepts there may be opposition from concerned goldfish enthusiasts and ecologists worried about introducing alien spieces.

The reaction from government agencies last week was lukewarm. Sepa warned that the goldfish might be killed by pollution washed off from industrial sites. “We certainly wouldn’t encourage the introduction of non-native species like goldfish, and they could prove attractive fishing targets for humans and herons alike,” said a Sepa spokesman.

A Scottish Natural Heritage spokesman said it would be better to use native species such as frogs and newts. “We would be very uncomfortable about a non-native fish being spread around the country. They are fine in garden ponds but not across the countryside.”

Scottish Water, however, did not dismiss the idea out of hand. “Whether Suds could sustain fish life would have to be decided on a case-by-case basis because of the many factors involved – not least the water quality,” said a spokesman.

Environmental group WWF Scotland was more positive. “This is an imaginative idea,” said head of policy Dr Richard Dixon. “It might help us to create attractive areas for nature at the same time as dealing with our waste-water problems in a sustainable fashion.”

http://www.sundayherald.com/40304

Tuesday, 02-Mar-2004 10:45:23 GMT